Air Defence of India: Evolving Options

Indiandefencereview Logo
By Air Marshal Anil Chopra Last modified on September 2, 2024 11:15 am
Mirage Aircraft
Air Defence of India: Evolving Options - © Indian Defence Review

Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) attempted a large force ‘reposte’ on February 27, 2019, in response to Indian Air Force’s (IAF) deep air strikes on targets in Balakot. The PAF launched a 24-aircraft force comprising F-16, JF-17 and Mirage-V in a wide area on India’s Western border in broad daylight. They included decoy formations and strike aircraft escorted by Air Defence (AD) fighters. The IAF responded with eight AD aircraft that included SU-30 MKI air superiority fighters, Mirage 2000 multi-role aircraft and MiG-21 Bison AD fighters. The IAF’s quick response prevented PAF aircraft from crossing the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). However, PAF fighters released H 4 Stand-off glide bombs from within their own territory that fell near Indian army units in Nowshera-Rajouri sector of J&K. In the ensuing air battle, one MiG-21 piloted by Wg Cdr Abhinandan chased an F-16 into Pakistan territory and shot it down with an R-73 missile. In the process, his MiG-21 Bison was targeted by a PAF aircraft or ground fire. The air battle was supported by Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AEW&C) aircraft on both sides. This was the latest aerial event related to the air defence of India.

Inter-continental operations were possible in World War II because of maturing of air power which decided the outcome of the six-year war. The air defence of Britain actually became the turning point when German offensive against Britain was thwarted through better tactics and newer technologies. Air defence success or failure in the Arab-Israeli wars of 1967, 1973 and Bekka Valley operations decided the outcome of wars. AD operations played a significant role in the victory in the 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pak Wars. The coordinated 9/11 aerial attacks against United States by al-Qaeda have brought a new dimension to the air threat. Meanwhile, the AD fighter has become faster, more agile and stealthy. The world is engaged in developing AD counters to the ballistic and tactical missile threat. The proliferation of inexpensive unmanned air systems has added a cheap but potent weapon in the hands of many. The threat of an aerial attack launched from space today is real. India has recently joined the club of four nations who have successfully tested Anti-Satellite (ASAT) capability.

Modern Airborne Platforms

The fighter-bomber aircraft remains the main instrument of prosecuting air war and conversely also for air defence. In addition to creating air superiority for unhindered operations of surface forces, they have the capability to deliver very lethal and accurate aerial weapons and the fighter fleet consumes major parts of defence budgets. Since 2005, the world is making fifth-generation fighters. First among them was the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. Their main characteristics are agility, super cruise, stealth, multi-function AESA radars, network-centric systems, integrated glass cockpits, fibre-optics data-transmission, multi-spectral sensors, fused situational picture, helmet-mounted sights and Precision Guided Weapons (PGM). Fighters strive to have ‘First-look, first-shoot, first-kill’ ability. Modern 4+ generation fighters are the F-16 Bock 70, Rafale, Eurofighter, Gripen JAS 39 E/F and Russian Su-35. The just inducting, or under development 5th Generation fighters are American F-35, Russian Su-57, Chinese J-20 and J-31. India’s indigenous AMCA will also be in this category. Sixth generation fighters are on drawing boards and expected to be inducted in the early 2030s. Other significant airborne platforms that support air operations are the Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AEW&C) aircraft, electronic warfare platforms and aerial refuelers. More and more of these roles are gradually being taken over by unmanned or optionally-manned aircraft. All these platforms are thus part of the aerial threat.

Airborne AD Sensors

Airborne radars are the main sensor for acquiring the opposing aircraft and today, it is possible at well Beyond Visual Ranges (BVR). State-of-the-art Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars allow simultaneous tracking and attack on multiple targets in different dimensional positions. All modern fighters have AESA radars. Many nations including India are developing their own. India’s DRDO is working on AESA LSTAR radar for Airborne Early Warning platform and Uttam AESA multi-function radar for Tejas Mk II. AESA EL/M-2075 radar is part of the IAF’s Phalcon AEW&C system. Passive Infra-Red Search and Tracking (IRST) sensors also form important part of aircraft suite.

AEW&C radars can detect aircraft, ships and vehicles at long ranges (500 km) and simultaneously perform command and control and battle management functions. Boeing 707-320-based E-3 Sentry and Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye are the most used systems worldwide. The Russian Air Force is upgrading Beriev A-50 to AESA-based Beriev A-100. China has IL-76-based KJ-3000 AEW&C. The IAF operates the AEW&C with the Israeli Phalcon radar on IL-76. India also has two Embraer-based smaller AEW&C aircraft ‘Netra’. Airbus A330-based AWACS are planned by DRDO in the future.

Aerial AD Weapons

Air-to-Air Missiles (AAM) could typically have kill range as far as 200km. Top-end AAMs include Russian Vympel R-77 and R-37M (400km), US Raytheon AIM-120 AMRAAM (180km) and AIM-9X Sidewinder, French MBDA MICA and Meteor (180km), MBDA AIM-132 ASRAAM, Israeli Rafael Python 5 and I-Derby ER, PL-15 (400km) of China and Astra (110km) of India. Some anti-radiation missiles are being converted to intercept AEW&C class aircraft. Novator KS-172 is a Russian air-to-air missile designed as an AWACS killer with a reported range up to 400km could one day come on SU-30 MKI. In future, Ramjet-propelled AAMs will enable medium-range missiles to maintain higher average speed across their engagement envelope.

See also  Teledyne FLIR Introduces Neutrino SX12 ISR1200 MWIR Camera with Zoom Lens for Ground ISR

Fifth-generation electro-optical missiles are ideal against low-heat targets such as UAVs and cruise missiles. In the coming years, the development of Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) will give much higher levels of precision. Very narrow beams of Lasers, microwave radiation, particle beams would destroy or damage guidance systems or trigger warheads. Hyper-Velocity AAMs will be multi-stage kinetic energy weapon with speeds in excess of Mach 5. Anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons “for electronic or physical destruction of satellites in both LEO (2,000-km altitude above earth’s surface) and the higher geo-synchronous orbit” have been developed. India recently joined USA, Russia and China by successfully demonstrating this ability.

Surface AD Radars

Ground-based radars are important element to manage the air threat. High and medium powered surveillance radars, tethered aerostat radar balloons, missile acquisition and guidance radars, tactical battlefield mobile radars and ship-based radars are all part of the ground sensor network. Radars such as Raytheon AN/MPQ-35 can detect high/medium-altitude threat for MIM-23 Hawk surface-to-air missile system. Northrop-Grumman AN/TPS-75 is transportable three-dimensional air search radar. The Chinese ground-based radars include the very powerful REWY-1 long-range surveillance radar and YLC-18 medium-range, low-altitude 3D radar. Russians have the ‘Duga’ series of over-the-horizon radars and Don-2N and Voronezh anti-ballistic missile radars. To cater for the stealth aircraft threat, Russia, China and Israel are developing very long-range L, UHF and VHF wavelength radars. India is developing a large number of radars to cover the entire AD threat bubble over the country.

Ground-Based AD Weapons

Typically, fighter aircraft backed by AWACS will cover the farthest outer ring for Air Defence. The middle distances would be covered by long and medium-range Surface-to-Air missiles (SAM). The inner ring would be of the Close-In Weapons (CIWS) like short-range quick-reaction SAMs and anti-aircraft guns. The Ballistic Missile Defence requires very long range interceptor missiles such as Israeli Arrow-II co-developed with USA. There are systems like the MIM-104 Patriot to take on smaller artillery projectiles and surface-to-surface missiles. Short-range missiles such as SA-6 and SA-8, Hawk, Rapier, Roland, Spada 2000, and Tunguska can neutralise low-flying high speed fighters. Long-range weapons include the Patriot and S-300 systems, which have effective ranges up to 200km and offer relatively good mobility.

Very long-range systems such as the Russian S-400 have a range of 400km. Israel has some of the most potent AD missile systems. These include the Arrow missile system, SPYDER, Raytheon MIM-104 Patriot, Barak-8, David’s Sling, Iron Dome and Iron Beam. The S-500 is a new generation SAM designed for intercepting Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) and to attack AEW&C aircraft. US AD systems include MIM-23 medium-range Hawk, Raytheon MIM-104 Patriot, Terminal High Altitude Air Defence (THAAD), Raytheon FIM-92 Stinger short-range missile system, M247 Sergeant York DIVAD self-propelled, anti-aircraft gun system, and the Phalanx CIWS. Pakistan Air Defence has ten batteries of MBDA Spada 2000 low-cum-medium altitude missile with 20km range which replaced the Crotale.

Over the years, anti-aircraft guns have improved ballistic and high explosive high-caliber shells. These are optically or radar controlled; and have very high rate of fire. However, stand-off delivery of aerial weapons has reduced the effective employment of guns. Man-Portable missiles (MANPADS) and Quick Reaction short-range Missiles (QRM) are more extensively used. These include RBS 70 NG, SA-7 Grail, Blowpipe, Stinger, Igla and S-10 Strella class. Among the latest is the General Dynamics RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile which is smaller, faster and allows for mid-flight course correction (guidance) to ensure a hit. Russian Kashtan CIWS uses both, a six barrel 30mm Gsh-6-30 gun and the 9M311 missiles.

Surface-to-Surface Threat

Proliferation of surface-to-surface weapons with long range and also some with nuclear/biological/chemical warheads needs a counter. Many countries including USA, China, Israel and India have developed Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) and conventional SAM systems. The Israeli Arrow ABM system was very successful against the SCUD attacks. The Arrow 3 system under development will be capable of exo-atmosphere interception of ballistic missiles. The Iron Dome and David’s Sling are designed to intercept tactical ballistic missiles, as well as medium-to-long-range rockets and slower-flying cruise missiles up to 300km. India is developing its own Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missile system.

Terrorist in the Air

The September 2011 coordinated air attacks over America by terrorists hijacking airliners and carrying out suicide attacks against ground targets, brought a new dimension to air threat. Any aerial platform or weapon falling into terrorists’ hands could thus have implications. Two immediate concerns are about the terrorists acquiring weapon-laden UAVs or surface-to-surface missiles. Motivated terrorists could train to join civil or military aviation and later carry out suicide attacks. Terrorists have the advantage of choosing the time and place of attack. While response to the threat would be conventional, but better surveillance, policing, and prevention of weapons falling into their hands is more important.

See also  Waiver to Covid Vaccines at WTO

Air Threat to India

At the strategic and tactical levels, China’s air power can now achieve a variety of effects. Though their current concentration is on operations in the South China Sea, the same weapons will be used against India. China wants to exploit the advantage of using its tactical/strategic missile force, which is easier to use for offensive than defend against. The PLAAF plans to move the forward edge of the battle into enemy territory. It will use air offensive to try and keep the IAF head-down. Like the IZF, the PLAAF has switched to net-centric offensive air defence and has greater reliance on an integrated attack.

China’s ambition is to build its airpower like the US for an asymmetric advantage. The PLAAF is aiming to be one of the world’s foremost air forces by 2020, made up of at least 1,000 ‘modern’ combat aircraft. The Russian Su-35, along with its advanced IRBIS-E passive electronically scanned array radar system, has already entered service. Of greater concern also is the offensive capability in terms of PGMs and the surface-to-surface missiles. With 22 Combat Squadrons having 450 combat and over 300 other support aircraft, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) can still push a punch. It is heavily dependent on China for hardware and support. The F-16, JF-17 and FC-20 will finally be the mainstay of the PAF. Pakistan has been in talks with China to acquire the J-31 stealth fighters and with Russia for the Su-35 air-superiority multi-role fighter. Pakistan has an evolving surface-to-surface missile force and India needs to cater for that.

Unity of AD Control

India is a large sub-continent with about 3,300,000 sq.km. of territory, land frontiers running over 15,000 km and a coastline of over 7000 km. The national airspace hence, spans a much larger sphere and is estimated to be about over 40 million cu km. India also sits across vital inter-continental air traffic routes. The IAF is responsible for the air defence of India. An Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ) is the airspace over land or water in which the identification, location and control of civil aircraft is exercised in the interest of national security. The zone may extend beyond a country’s territory to give more time to respond to possibly hostile aircraft.

To safeguard India’s strategic security interests and to institute proper air-space surveillance, India promulgates and enforces appropriate ADIZs. The IAF takes inputs from the civil, Army and Navy radars and using its own radar network, creates a consolidated air picture for AD purposes. For Situational Awareness (SA), this picture is given to the Army and Navy at Joint Operations level.

Airspace Management in TBA

Airspace management is a combination of air defence measures implemented primarily by the IAF with the assistance of the Army and Navy in certain areas. The IAF is responsible for giving AD clearance for all flights over India. Some localised leverage has been given to the Army and Navy to fly their aircraft and UAVs, by keeping IAF informed of flight details. The AD of Army’s own assets in TBA is their own responsibility. Similarly, the Navy manages AD of own ships and assets. The AD of rest of the country is the IAF’s responsibility. Airspace command and control requires unity of control for the myriad actions performed by the various military elements. It requires qualified people, information and a support structure to build a comprehensive picture of the battle space. Other field elements provide planning resources.

To avoid fratricide, an Air Space Control (ASC) has to be established. Several types of control exist that can be used exclusively or combined to achieve the desired degree of autonomy in operations. It could be direct control by a radar or ATC controller or procedural control through pre-approved and disseminated procedures. In the TBA, hostile criteria for identifying targets and coordinating fires are laid out. Air control points are designated separately for entry/exit, en route, orbit/holding, contact point, rendezvous, egress control, penetration, ingress, and return. These control procedures allow friendly aircraft to move safely throughout the TBA by utilising predictable flight paths for positive identification. Fire support coordination allows opening areas of the battle space for rapid engagement of targets or to restrict and control fires. Permissive fire support coordinating measures facilitate attacking enemy targets. Restrictive fire support coordinating measures provide safeguards for friendly forces.

Layered Air Defence

There are areas where fighter aircraft have the clear operational advantage over surface-based systems. Surface-to-air missile systems will not be allowed to fire weapons in this area unless targets are positively identified as hostile. In the missile engagement zone, the responsibility for engagement normally rests with missiles. This could be a high-altitude or low-altitude zone. There are areas where multiple air defence weapon systems are simultaneously employed to engage air threats through sector separation. The Base Air Defence Zone (BADZ) is an air defence zone established around an air base and limited to the engagement envelope of short-range air defence weapon systems defending that base. Low Altitude Air Defense (LAAD) assets are employed at BADZs.

See also  Nuclear Submarine Ahoy: Whither Bound?

The Integrated Air Command and Control System

The Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) is an automated system for monitoring and controlling of all air operations of the IAF. For network-centric air operations, an air situation picture is created using various sensors and they same is made available at the appropriate tactical and operational levels for controlling air operations. Communications data-link architecture enables this process. Timely, tailored and fused intelligence is integral to all operations. Among the technology requirements are the primary and secondary radars for control and situational awareness, aircraft transponders, flight data processing systems, special software for fully automated systems, conflict alerts and algorithms for possible vectoring solution. Controller pilot data link communications and Operational Data Links (ODL) allow digital messages to be sent between platforms and ground system. Network-centric operations bring in threat of cyber warfare. India has set up a dedicated tri-service agency for handling offensive and defence cyber operations.

Air Defence Assets India

Fighter aircraft are the first AD asset. The IAF is currently down to 30 fighter squadrons vis-a-vis the authorised number of 42. The IAF has nearly 12 squadrons of Sukhoi Su-30 MKI air superiority fighters. There is a plan to upgrade them with AESA radar, RVV-SD (RVV-AE modernised), RVV-MD (R-73E modernised), Novator 100 and the indigenous Astra BVR air-to-air missile. The upgraded MiG-29 with latest avionics including Zhuk-ME radar, and air-to-air missiles like RVVAE is a dedicated interceptor. The upgraded Dassault Mirage 2000 with the RDY-2 radar and the advanced MICA missiles can also take on an AD role. The MiG-21 Bison also has an air defence role and will operate till 2022-2025.

Meanwhile, the IAF is inducting the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas to replace the MiG 21. The LCA will one day get an AESA radar and a full complement of aerial weapons. The Rafale too has significant AD capability with RBE2 AESA radar, MICA Infra-red/Beyond Visual Range (BVR) and MBDA Meteor BVR missiles. The indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) will add to the air defence capability when it is ready around 2030.

India has newer SAM systems, including the indigenous Akash medium range system jointly developed with Israel SPYDER. Five units of Russian S-400 have been ordered. The DRDO is likely to develop the Maitri Low Level Quick Reaction Missile (LLQRM) with MBDA. The LRSAM based on Barak 8 design is a joint development project between India and Israel Aircraft Industries. The indigenous Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system based on the Swordfish radar derived from the Israeli Green Pine radar and the Prithvi Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missiles have been tested at elements being put in place. A large numbers of ground radars such as indigenous Rajendra, Rohini and Elta Medium Powered Radars (MPR) and GS100 Low-Level Transportable Radars (LLTR) developed jointly between BEL and Thales are under induction. The DRDO is developing ‘Anudhra’ MPR. High Powered Radars with range in excess of 500km to replace the THD-1955 are being identified. The IAF already has Israeli Rafael Aerostat radars with range of 400km. The DRDO is also working on the indigenous ‘Akashdeep’ aerostat and is developing the 3D AESA Long Range Tracking Radar.

Air Defence Strategy of India

The defence of a nation from the air is primarily the responsibility of the IAF, but the surface-based ground and maritime assets of the Army and Navy also require air defence protection. The very large scope and dimension of air defence requires an integrated approach. Seamless integration of all anti-aircraft sensors (radars, visual observers, satellite information) and weapons (interceptor aircraft and surface-to-air guns and missiles) need to be under common command and control. The sensor and weapon coverage has to be horizontally and vertically layered to cover the entire air defence with multiple overlaps. The recent ASAT test also adds to the air defence of India from a possible hostile action from space.

The possible terror threat from the air is real, yet highly unpredictable and needs to be addressed closely. A weapon-loaded UAV has to be treated like any aircraft threat. Air defence against SSMs will greatly increase with the induction of the S-400. The IAF’s secure digital information grid called the Air Force Net (AFNET) is part of its network-centric warfare capability. The Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) links AD command and control centres with all sensors and weapons and it uses the AFNET to ride. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an area that needs to focus on for net-centric warfare. The system is meant to greatly improve situational awareness, reduce reaction time, and prevent fratricide. Air defence is where the action is; it is time to get the act right.

No comment on «Air Defence of India: Evolving Options»

Leave a comment

* Required fields